Daily news, dev blogs, and stories from Game Developer straight to your inbox
UK advertising regulator issues new guidance on in-game purchases
The revised guidelines are broadly designed to "prevent harm or consumer detriment."
September 24, 2021
3 Min Read
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has published new guidance on advertising in-app purchases in video games.
The guidelines were penned by the Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) and the Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice (BCAP), and are broadly designed to "prevent harm or consumer detriment."
The revised guidelines will apply to all forms of advertising for in-game products, although it's noted that in-game storefronts using virtual currency that can be earned in-game as well as purchased are unlikely to be considered advertising (out of scope).
As the table below shows, however, storefronts using virtual currency that's only purchasable using real-world cash are highly likely to be considered advertising (in scope).
Keeping that context in mind, the ASA explains that games deemed in-scope must make the cost of any transaction crystal clear. "This is particularly important when currency is 'bundled' and sold in a way that means the price-per-unit varies according to the size and price of the bundle (e.g. 100 credits for £5 and 200 for £7)," notes the guidance.
The guidelines also state that consumers must be made aware of how much a virtual purchase would cost in real-world cash to avoid obscuring the value of a transaction. "Where a storefront using digital currency falls within remit, the value of an item should be clear to consumers; they should be able to determine easily what the equivalent real-world price is for the item and/or whether they will need to spend money on more virtual currency," it continues.
'Odd-pricing' tactics, which force players to buy more currency than they require to buy items, are also deemed potentially misleading. As such, the ASA is advising those using the technique to warn players that a minimum spend may be required when advertising purchasable items.
The ASA has even flagged the presentation of in-game purchases as problematic, and notes that "immersive marketing messages" which attempt to pressure players into spending cash -- using techniques like countdown timers or needlessly complex offers -- would be best avoided.
"For ads within gameplay, such as pop-up offers to purchase extra resources to complete or retry a failed level, or to skip waiting times, marketers should avoid the use of mechanics that may place undue pressure onto players and prevent them from making an informed choice or mislead them as to the nature of the purchase."
As for loot boxes (defined as 'random-item purchasing'), the ASA says consumers must not be misled about their chances of securing certain items, especially where multiple purchases are concerned.
Finally, the guidelines state advertising should make it clear when in-game purchases are present, and must also highlight whether loot boxes are present -- although the ASA claims any such messaging doesn't need to be "especially prominent."
"For some consumers, particularly those with specific vulnerabilities, the presence of in-game purchasing (and especially random-item purchasing) may be material to their decision to purchase or download a game. As such, marketers should ensure that advertising for the game makes clear that the game contains in-game purchasing and, if relevant, that this includes random-item purchasing," adds the regulator.
Although the guidelines are precisely that -- a guide rather than a statutory obligation -- the ASA notes has a variety of sanctions it can use against offenders, and could eventually refer them to other bodies who can take more drastic action.
"One of our most persuasive sanctions is bad publicity – an advertiser’s reputation can be badly damaged if it is seen to be ignoring the rules designed to protect consumers," it explains. "Ultimately if advertisers and broadcasters persistently break the Advertising Codes and don’t work with us, we can and do refer them to other bodies for the further action, such as Trading Standards or Ofcom. Such referrals are rarely necessary, as most advertisers prefer to resolve the matter directly with us."
Those interested can read the full guidance on advertising in-game purchases right here.
About the Author(s)
News Editor, GameDeveloper.com
Game Developer news editor Chris Kerr is an award-winning journalist and reporter with over a decade of experience in the game industry. His byline has appeared in notable print and digital publications including Edge, Stuff, Wireframe, International Business Times, and PocketGamer.biz. Throughout his career, Chris has covered major industry events including GDC, PAX Australia, Gamescom, Paris Games Week, and Develop Brighton. He has featured on the judging panel at The Develop Star Awards on multiple occasions and appeared on BBC Radio 5 Live to discuss breaking news.
You May Also Like
Exploring the 2024 State of the Game Industry report - Game Developer Podcast ep. 39Feb 2, 2024
Phantom inspiration and the ethical auteur with Xalavier Nelson Jr.Dec 8, 2023
Designing Killer Queen: from playground experiment to modern arcade sensationOct 18, 2023
Rod Humble and King Choi illustrate the ambition of Life By YouSep 22, 2023
Get daily news, dev blogs, and stories from Game Developer straight to your inbox
Subscribe to Game Developer Newsletters to stay caught up with the latest news, design insights, marketing tips, and more