[The GameDiscoverCo game discovery newsletter is written by ‘how people find your game’ expert & company founder Simon Carless, and is a regular look at how people discover and buy video games in the 2020s.]
Welcome back, my esteemed colleagues, to a post-GDC and post-Oscars reality. And oof, there’s a lot going on about both on social media. Luckily we’re here to breeze past the dialogue, and bring you some snappy trends from the world of game discovery.
At GDC, delighted that my buddies at the Video Game History Foundation were there to grab a bunch of exhibitor handouts for posterity. In an era where we’re even getting blockchain Wizardry games (?!), great to have VGHF - profiled here as they hit 5 years old - documenting things. (Support ‘em with $ or donations of old game dev material!)
Game Pass: first-party, external views from GDC?
So if you’re wondering what’s up with Microsoft’s Game Pass subscription service, there was a whole bunch of new data about the platform, thanks to Game Developers Conference last week.
As a starting point, you should check out ‘Game Pass: Maximizing Your Game’s Total Value’, presented by Microsoft’s Joyce Lin and Eugene Kim, which could best be described as a light and breezy Game Pass ‘infomercial’. It uses a series of Xbox internal stats to show why MS believes that all developers should consider coming to Game Pass.
It’s on a relatively less-trafficked YouTube channel, ‘Microsoft Game Dev’, so only has about 2,200 views so far. It pitches Game Pass as a veritable ‘Swiss Army knife’ to fix discovery problems, featuring slides such as this:
Oh, and before we continue looking at the data in the presentation, might be worth looping back up to the top image from the talk: the 100+ third party ‘Game Pass at launch’ titles in 2020 and 2021 seeing ‘3.5x audience lift vs. Steam in the first 30 days’.
We believe it means that the unique median number of players on Steam was, for example, 20-50k on Steam in the first month, but 70k-175k on Game Pass. (There’s no way for us to know the real number here, but our guesstimate is within that range.)
Anyhow, the juiciest slides start about seven minutes in, and we don’t have space to show them all. But here’s a Tweet with four of the most notable ones, and we’ll list some of the main takeaways on ‘more reach’:
- Game Pass members play 40% more games in the 90 day period after joining, and explore ‘30% more genres’.
- ‘Already on Xbox’ titles entering Game Pass will see an average lift of 8.3x players, with lowest being 1.6x and highest being 28x.
- Social conversation around a game goes up 3x when you appear on Game Pass.
One slide we did want to showcase was MAU increases for Game Pass. It’s especially notable for indie ([email protected]) creators, which isn’t too surprising:
How about Game Pass & monetization, though?
All of this make sense. Where it gets a little more interesting is in the ‘do Xbox Game Pass players spend more money?’ conversation. Firstly, Xbox notes that total PSM (‘post-sale monetization’) for DLC and IAP goes up 2.8x in the 90 days after joining Game Pass, 50% of it from Game Pass members who didn’t play the game previously.
(Which I don’t think should be controversial, given the extra eyeballs on your game. If you make a lot of $ with those mechanics, popping in and out of Game Pass is eminently worth it if you can get the right deal, at the right time in your lifecycle.)
In addition, Xbox specifically says that Game Pass players spend 50% more on games than ‘lookalike users’ who are not in Game Pass:
This is probably one of the only stats in the presentation that I’m a little vaguer on, since finding real ‘look-alikes’ is not very easy, one would imagine.
However, Ampere Analysis’ Piers Harding-Rolls, whose firm has a ‘game subscription’ research service - did an excellent GDC presentation last week (.PDF mirrored here, thx Piers!) including the following slide. It agrees on the direction of travel, if not the exact numbers:
Piers also concludes in his research that Game Pass is a whopping 60% of the current market for game subscription services, btw - with Apple Arcade (9%) and Google Play Pass (7%) the closest competitors. Quite a market lead.
But where I’d like to end this discussion is on a couple of specific data and conversation points. Firstly, this Xbox slide showing upside for [email protected] Partners who had Game Pass deals:
And secondly, Phil Spencer, in the wholesomely named ‘Empowering game creators in everything we do’ talk, saying: “I also want to make clear to people that are out there that for us at Xbox, there's not one business model that we think is going to win. I often get asked by developers ‘if I'm not in the subscription, am I just not viable on Xbox anymore?’ It's absolutely not true.”
To which I’d say - how about [email protected] premium-only titles without Game Pass deals? I’d love to see a graph of their 2016-2022 growth on a ‘median revenue per game’ basis. What would that show? Is viability increasing dramatically for those who don’t interact with Game Pass, or is it a nexus that is drawing in most titles over their lifecycle? (It can’t be simultaneously incredibly good and also unimportant to success.)
Conclusion: how does Game Pass impact the biz?
I suspect that folks at Xbox have been taken aback at times by the levels of unease towards Game Pass - at least privately - from devs and publishers that don’t understand what is happening to their business right now.
And I wish Microsoft as a company wasn’t such a ‘good feelings only’ spin factory - especially public-facing - which is one of the reasons that I reflexively want to push back against them. (But hey, I’m the pessimist realist, let’s not forget.)
But I think I finally understand where we’re at. We have a supply/demand imbalance in the wider video game market, as I talked about a couple of weeks ago. This is the major, underlying trend. There’s too many premium PC/console games out there for devs to get great ROI on all their new titles launched in the open market, given the increased investment in this space.
So companies are relying - increasingly - on a few megahits, or on GaaS titles tuned for long-term monetization. Or on a newer source of revenue, which is guaranteed $ from platforms for subscriptions. For a lot of indies who didn’t make great money before on Xbox, this is absolutely new, helpful money, especially as Steam gets trickier.
Heck, we were just looking in Friday’s Plus-exclusive newsletter at new releases like Norco (92 peak Steam CCUs) and A Memoir Blue (16 peak Steam CCUs). These are Game Pass Day 1 titles - and likely to make the majority of their revenue from Xbox’s lump payment, at least in the medium-term. (Game Pass didn’t cause this, btw.)
But due to this confluence of events, the market is creating a different supply and demand issue here on the B2B side of things. Alongside an enthusiastic Game Pass player base, here’s a large and increasing supply of devs who want to be on the service - and a necessarily limited demand from Microsoft for new games from third parties.
So yes, the excellently curated Game Pass does help solve for discovery. Being in it or not can be a ‘value add’ lifecycle management question for many, not an existential profitability question. But for smaller devs, if it’s the latter, it fundamentally changes the balance of power in platform/dev relationships. And we’ll get to what this means in a (delayed, sorry!) newsletter in a week or two.